Consider this description a bit of an expansion on my video as well as an anticipation of coming comments.
"It's just comedy Mike, lighten up."
Yes, it is meant to be funny. But that isn't the same as saying that it doesn't carry any weight and isn't meant to convince anyone of anything. A lot of persuasion is done through comedy and it's rather a weak response to say "it was just a joke" after such persuasion is shown to be fallacious. Further, I have heard many people use this same argument quite seriously. It would be odd to simply pretend it is merely a joke. It is a joke, but it is not merely a joke.
"The REAL point he's making is that the reason you reject those other gods is the same reasoning that will get you to reject your belief in God, if you follow the logic properly."
While I have heard this argument in various forms many times I have never heard a person present it in a convincing way. Every time I can recall someone making this point they overlook the differences in the nature of the God of Christianity and these other gods which Christians reject. Consider Thor as an example. Thor is a created being, his own existence is contingent on other things, he is not morally perfect or the grounding of anything. So classic arguments for God, such as the moral, contingency, ontological, teleological arguments, or arguments from fulfilled prophecy, or the resurrection of Christ, simply cannot be applied to Thor. In other words, the reasons for believing in the God of Christianity are completely unlike the reasons for believing in Thor. Therefore, rejecting Thor presents me with zero reason to reject God. So, on the grounds of logic, Ricky's argument is a bad one.
So, we are back to the fact that this is an example of shallow thinking couched in humor and snark, which causes people to be unwise about truly important issues.
My website https://BibleThinker.org